Re: Do we release SC or not?
Thomas Thym <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Monday 06 September 2010 17:29:25 schrieb Carl Symons: On Monday 06 September 2010 17:29:25 wrote Carl Symons: > On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Sebastian Kügler <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Friday, September 03, 2010 19:41:06 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > >> On Thursday, September 2, 2010, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > >> > Everything I've heard until now (and that includes the whole "SC" idea) > >> > sounds just clumsy and doesn't feel practical. It's doable in paragraphs > >> > of text, but it's pretty much impractical for producing headlines. > >> > >> http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-promo&m=128043108730686&w=2 > > > > The idea sounds sound, but in practise to make it work, I find it sounding > > silly. Not so much for the x.y.0 releases, but for bugfix updates, it's almost > > Microsoft-ish. (Patchday, anyone?) > > -- > > sebas > > > > Well, there are several ideas floating around this issue; "Release > Day" is only one of several. For me, the key is to communicate > something that connects properly with the audience (from a marketing > perspective). To use the bugfix update example, how about: > > ***KDE bugfix update*** > Today KDE releases series 4.6.2 updates that include Applications and > Plasma Workspaces. While some new features are offered, the primary > emphasis for this Release Event is to continue improving quality and > to finetune existing features. These updates will improve the > performance of earlier KDE versions, so upgrading is recommended. > > Nothing Microsoft-ish about it. Facts, no vaporware, hype, cutesy terminology. > > Descriptive headline that speaks to how users are listening > Shared version number identifying the occasion--the Release Event > What is included and why > > Microsoft Patch Day has always occurred to me thusly...there are so > many things broken and breakable that we are committed to providing > patches monthly. Subtext - we won't get to them all, we hope to get to > most of the ones that are really broken, we will probably get to the > ones that cause us the most grief or hurt our revenues/relationships > with our best customers. > > This way of thinking is foreign to the way KDE operates. > > Carl From my (business) POV I personaly woud avoid pointing to bugs and other weaknesses in a release public spreaded announcement. I would prefer to mention it as "quality improvements" or " performance optimation / update" or something like that. (btw see the Snowleopard marketing.) Just for further brainstrorming: Carl, you mentioned "KDE releases series 4.6.2". So the "product" would be "KDE Series 4.6". Intresting. I read about the "KDE Suite 4.5" after our 4.5 release day. Were these two termes discussed yet? Cheers, Thomas > _______________________________________________ > This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. > > Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription. > _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.