Plasma 5 first release
Łukasz Sawicki <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJS6hc+08ZELNVqCcpxWKZRG1Yt_GzaXqo8tTG2TTm3x+63LNw__2794.4860318259$1405374650$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
Hello, As a person deeply interested in KDE's development, I would like to raise my voice just this once. I have been blogging about KDE for quite a few years now and simply have to point out a few aspects of Plasma 5's release announcement. What I'm concerned about is the applications' look. Why in the following pictures: http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/www/sites/www/announcements/plasma5.0/screenshots/ oxygen is shown as the widget style? For your information, yes, I do follow the discussions on relevant mailing lists. Therefore I do know that Breeze (Qwidget-Qtcurve) with Qt Quick Controls have been selected for the default theme of Plasma 5. Meanwhile, oxygen was selected for the default window decoration due to reasons concerning performance. I would like to focus on the visual appeal of Plasma 5 for a while. This will be the 1st „new gen” release of Plasma in 6 years, therefore this is a tremendous opportunity for marketing actions, such ash showing the world the potential and progress behind KDE. This makes me extremely confused as to why oxygen (widget style and decoration) is shown, despite the beta 2 screenshots with Breeze ( https://dot.kde.org/2014/06/10/plasma-5-second-beta-needs-testing). Furthermore, the latter was very warmly greeted by the community. In my humble opinion, it would be simply logical and beneficial to show the new look and feel in the official release screenshots. Here are a few reasons to do so: 1. They are coherent with the new Plasma's design, while oxygen is clearly not and introduces a visual inconsistency 2. The principle of first impression, as written by Thomas Pfeiffer ( http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/2014-May/031299.html). Here, let me quote him: I personally still like Oxygen a lot, but people (not only trolls, but the majority of people) are strongly influenced by design trends and do not perceive something as "new" if it adheres to design trends of the past. Therefore if we show them a Plasma Next which looks like "KDE4", people's first impression will be "It looks like KDE4! So all the fuss about nothing?". And the problem, from a psychological perspective, is this: After a first impression has been formed (which is strongly influenced by the look), an effect called "conformation bias" [1] kicks in, which makes people focus on aspects that confirm the first impression. Therefore they will tend to focus on everything which is _not_ new about Plasma Next and neglect the things which are. This means that the perception of Plasma Next as a whole (including the technical aspects) is likely to be negatively influenced by the first impression telling people "This doesn't look new at all!". 3. Contradicting previous materials, such as the test versions. Examples include the RC: ( http://kde.org/announcements/plasma-5.0-rc.php ) and Beta 2: ( https://dot.kde.org/2014/06/10/plasma-5-second-beta-needs-testing ). 4. Most people will judge Plasma 5 based on the new screenshots, and very few will read into exact details regarding oxygen, Breeze et cetera. Even braver individuals will download ISO images, such as ( http://apachelog.wordpress.com/2014/06/20/weekly-plasma-5-live-iso/ ). Even in Neon 5 Live ISO Breeze is the default style. I hope that my opinion will not be viewed as any sort of critique. My goal is simply to focus some attention on the current official screenshots, as they will be a staple of Plasma 5's opinion among many users. Therefore, let me repeat myself slightly, it is only logical and just to show the new and best of Plasma. This can be done by showing Breeze, not oxygen, on the screenshots. Cheers, Łukasz Sawicki _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.