Re: KDE Neon and how to handle this?
Luca Beltrame <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5352889.mevFYgtfrZ__45401.5738716864$1455220622$gmane$org@leon> |
In data giovedì 11 febbraio 2016 20:07:09 CET, Boudewijn Rempt ha scritto: > In any case, as far as I am concerned, the relation between Neon and > KDE is the same as between my project and KDE: both are KDE projects. > Some people don't like that, but tant pis. However, there's still an ambiguity: is Neon a distro[1], or not[2]? [1] http://blog.davidedmundson.co.uk/blog/neon-and-plasma [2] http://blog.davidedmundson.co.uk/blog/neon-and-plasma#comment-2507737060 I think the reach of this ambiguity has been underestimated. As I said elsewhere, my main concerns with having KDE hosting a project providing binaries based on one specific distro is that I don't want issues *in the distro* (no matter what it is, even LFS for all I care) to be perceived as issues *in KDE software*. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: A29D259B _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 455 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAABCgAGBQJWvOdyAAoJEEDIKBSTsBwWbrcH/1dZc9FNYZehTU00qhi1y4ng ZE6kpguWRc8BndZEQWP22yu6ewpTihd47rEMEwtQp3HOtmer/OFcuiBgnoDluf2K tuzni42UoFs5GChdYm8wulH77krIYPzeaWim2k87MH7Q82Y2cy3X7v1NKs0TgqL6 2KyXqRTAWUOXD0GH0Q4hDPm+LglvFo2OtwSrDP7yJgH2nJBUq2eQEtBM3dBbxFAo uOmExWhaSpO+85EL8e6jJr8HNozhc7hV+f0aZwevXbpoh2cs3ePxs74tiNVz5axu hmGz9aHs70mC+dpXE/+Lbdpmb6twymbahHGPsfHtzQdPEIp+CXYCQNK2hubTMoY= =tfUZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----