Re: KDE Neon and how to handle this?

Marco Martin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.events
Message-ID <1827739.GBeGLvTjaS__31373.2574497864$1455228283$gmane$org@phobos>
On Thursday 11 February 2016 12:51:54 Bryan Lunduke wrote:
> Ok.  Fair.  But the KDE eV board *did* make a statement about this.
> 
> https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/neon/2015-November/000020.html
> 
> "The voting is over and the membership was clear in that KDE can have
> a distribution and that the KDE Neon team is well-suited to do this
> task. The board is committed to help the project move forward and put
> everything at hand to make it happen."
> 
> Which even makes it sounds like the board has direct involvement.  I
> mean.  That's a pretty clear statement from the board that Neon is the
> KDE distro.  Is this statement wrong?  (I'm not trying to be
> argumentative here... just trying to sift through the contradicting
> statements I'm getting.)
> 
> Who would be the right person to make a statement about this?

As noted, the board can't really, as they are purely administrative.
best would be on the neon.kde.org.uk website itself?
better yet, when the project is announced on 
https://www.kde.org/announcements/ but the incubation period needs to be over 
(what's the ETA for that?)
just a couple of points to make really explicit:
* Is it the official KDE distribution? (no)
and
* are other distributions welcome to join as well? (yes)

-- 
Marco Martin

_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.