Re: KDE Neon and how to handle this?
Mario Fux <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2197267.z9z8PTW9zS__36244.7656029419$1455361724$gmane$org@andromeda> |
Am Saturday 13 February 2016, 10.54:54 schrieb Cornelius Schumacher: Morning As a short notice here: I'm working on a short email about this issue, about KDE Neon which I'll submit this afternoon. This I'm doing as the sponsor of the KDE Neon project in the KDE Incubator. And something small below. > On Friday 12 February 2016 19:03:59 Ivan Čukić wrote: > > The e.V. and the Board are in a nice position to make statements in > > the sense that they are a legally existing entities, and that to > > outsiders, their statements might sound more official. Also, e.V. is > > the only practical way to gain some insight to the contributors' > > opinion, which was (ab)used for things like the Neon vote, but it > > still is not an excuse to (ab)use that even further. > > This is about communication, not control. It is important who sends a > message. As you say the board is in a position, where its message is heard. > It is the elected representative of the members of KDE e.V., who are the > elected representatives of the community. It's the best way of > communicating on behalf of the project we have. Either I understand it differently or this is not really correct. In particular the "who are the elected representatives of the community". KDE e.V. members are not really elected by the community. I see KDE e.V. as a subset of the KDE community (and thus KDE) that takes care of legal and financial matters. Done. [snip] griits Mario _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.