Re: KDE Neon and how to handle this?

just my two cents since seems a lot of people have short memory.

ten days ago kde neon was a distro, or so was said,
https://www.reddit.com/r/kde/comments/43tp4i/is_kde_neon_a_distribution_or_not/
few days after seems was not...

on 31/01/2016 kubuntu live iso and neon seem to have been the same...
unless kde neon just walked over the names other projects and wants to
confuse people...
​​
https://community.kde.org/Plasma/InstallingNext#Live_CD

i keep reading that kde ev takes care of legal and financial matters...
though this KDE Neon vote shows something else? Did kde ev overstepped
their responsability and if yes shall they step down?

Also I would like to know the official position towards the ad hominem
attacks that appeared in the g+ post of Bryan. Do we as KDE community
tolerate such attitudes and if yes why?

What I would like to see is a clear answer to:  Is kde an OS neutral
project or not?

Regards,
Alin




Without Questions there are no Answers!
______________________________________________________________________
Dr. Alin Marin ELENA
http://alin.elena.space/ <http://alin.elenaworld.net/>
______________________________________________________________________

On 13 February 2016 at 10:56, Mario Fux <[email protected]> wrote:

> Am Saturday 13 February 2016, 10.54:54 schrieb Cornelius Schumacher:
>
> Morning
>
> As a short notice here: I'm working on a short email about this issue,
> about
> KDE Neon which I'll submit this afternoon. This I'm doing as the sponsor of
> the KDE Neon project in the KDE Incubator.
>
> And something small below.
>
> > On Friday 12 February 2016 19:03:59 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > > The e.V. and the Board are in a nice position to make statements in
> > > the sense that they are a legally existing entities, and that to
> > > outsiders, their statements might sound more official. Also, e.V. is
> > > the only practical way to gain some insight to the contributors'
> > > opinion, which was (ab)used for things like the Neon vote, but it
> > > still is not an excuse to (ab)use that even further.
> >
> > This is about communication, not control. It is important who sends a
> > message. As you say the board is in a position, where its message is
> heard.
> > It is the elected representative of the members of KDE e.V., who are the
> > elected representatives of the community. It's the best way of
> > communicating on behalf of the project we have.
>
> Either I understand it differently or this is not really correct. In
> particular the "who are the elected representatives of the community". KDE
> e.V. members are not really elected by the community. I see KDE e.V. as a
> subset of the KDE community (and thus KDE) that takes care of legal and
> financial matters. Done.
>
> [snip]
>
> griits
> Mario
>
> _______________________________________________
> This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.
>
> Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set
> digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
>


_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.