Re: KDE Neon and how to handle this?

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Alin Marin Elena <[email protected]>
wrote:

> just my two cents since seems a lot of people have short memory.
>
> ten days ago kde neon was a distro, or so was said,
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/kde/comments/43tp4i/is_kde_neon_a_distribution_or_not/
> few days after seems was not...
>



> on 31/01/2016 kubuntu live iso and neon seem to have been the same...
> unless kde neon just walked over the names other projects and wants to
> confuse people...
> ​​
> https://community.kde.org/Plasma/InstallingNext#Live_CD
>
> i keep reading that kde ev takes care of legal and financial matters...
> though this KDE Neon vote shows something else? Did kde ev overstepped
> their responsability and if yes shall they step down?
>
> Note this is the eV, not the eV board.


> Also I would like to know the official position towards the ad hominem
> attacks that appeared in the g+ post of Bryan. Do we as KDE community
> tolerate such attitudes and if yes why?
>
> We don't. On the other hand if it happens outside KDE space what can we
can do?


> What I would like to see is a clear answer to:  Is kde an OS neutral
> project or not?
>

I can say quite clearly Plasma is.
I think it's safe to say KDE applications are too. Grouping "KDE" gets more
complex.

David


> Regards,
> Alin
>
>
>
>
> Without Questions there are no Answers!
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Dr. Alin Marin ELENA
> http://alin.elena.space/ <http://alin.elenaworld.net/>
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> On 13 February 2016 at 10:56, Mario Fux <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Am Saturday 13 February 2016, 10.54:54 schrieb Cornelius Schumacher:
>>
>> Morning
>>
>> As a short notice here: I'm working on a short email about this issue,
>> about
>> KDE Neon which I'll submit this afternoon. This I'm doing as the sponsor
>> of
>> the KDE Neon project in the KDE Incubator.
>>
>> And something small below.
>>
>> > On Friday 12 February 2016 19:03:59 Ivan Čukić wrote:
>> > > The e.V. and the Board are in a nice position to make statements in
>> > > the sense that they are a legally existing entities, and that to
>> > > outsiders, their statements might sound more official. Also, e.V. is
>> > > the only practical way to gain some insight to the contributors'
>> > > opinion, which was (ab)used for things like the Neon vote, but it
>> > > still is not an excuse to (ab)use that even further.
>> >
>> > This is about communication, not control. It is important who sends a
>> > message. As you say the board is in a position, where its message is
>> heard.
>> > It is the elected representative of the members of KDE e.V., who are the
>> > elected representatives of the community. It's the best way of
>> > communicating on behalf of the project we have.
>>
>> Either I understand it differently or this is not really correct. In
>> particular the "who are the elected representatives of the community". KDE
>> e.V. members are not really elected by the community. I see KDE e.V. as a
>> subset of the KDE community (and thus KDE) that takes care of legal and
>> financial matters. Done.
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> griits
>> Mario
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.
>>
>> Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe,
>> set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.
>
> Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set
> digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
>


_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.