Re: A Plasma Vision draft

Le lundi 26 septembre 2016, 15:12:08 CEST Thomas Pfeiffer a écrit :
> On 26.09.2016 13:27, Olivier Churlaud wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Sorry if I come late, I wasn't aware of this thread...
> > 
> > Le lundi 26 septembre 2016, 12:56:25 CEST Jens Reuterberg a écrit :
> >> "Plasma is for people using a computing device in a professional context,
> >> where productivity, performance and privacy are essential"
> > 
> > I find that the "is for people .." kind of restrictive. I agree that you
> > need to have a precise target audience, but don't freak out other people.
> > If this is your vision, it should be the first big sentence that people
> > will read. Normal users might say, 'uh, I want games as well, and
> > listening to music and editing videos: it's not for me'.
> 
> We could replace "is for" with "focuses on" if necessary.
> On the other hand, the stricter a vision is, the more useful it becomes to
> focus effort. With the above vision, if someone complains about bad gaming
> performance in Plasma, we can just ask "Do you play games in a professional
> context? If not, then sorry, your usecase is not what Plasma is made for."
> Editing videos, though, for me is a classic example of a professional
> context. Not everybody edits videos professionally, but if Plasma works
> well for those who do it professionally, it should also work well for those
> who do it privately.
> 
> It's really a question of "Do we dare scaring some people off in order to
> focus more on our target audience?"
> 
This is, actually, what I'm afraid of. I wouldn't dare, but I'm not a "real" 
plasma developer, so I'm not to make the decision :)
> > I wonder if the professional context is important. To me plasma is
> > productivity, performance and privacy. To achieve this, you target
> > professionals (more mission-like).
> 
> Again, depends on how much we want to focus.
> 
> > Some ideas, that still sound wrong to me, but less (I don't like the "for
> > people"):
> > "Plasma turns computing devices into productive, performant and private
> > tools"
> We had "performant" in our original draft, but then it was pointed out that
> it is not a proper English word.
I saw that, the word was underlined in red on kmail :)


> > "Plasma is for people for which productivity, performance and privacy are
> > essential"
> 
> If we don't want to define our target audience in the Vision, then this
> would be a good alternative. Then again, aren't those important for pretty
> much anybody?

Yes, you are right somehow, but on the other hand, Gnome has more a target on 
"beautiful, consistent and modern" (in my opinion, I don't know what their 
target is). So I would say that privacy is not essential for everyone (MacOS 
users), nor performance (a lot of people just want things to work, and are not 
freaked out by waiting 3min that Windows boots).

> > "Plasma aims at enhancing the productivity, performance and privacy of the
> > user experience"
> 
> I don't think an experience can have productivity... ;)
> 
> > "Plasma: experience prod, perf and priv" ?
> 
> That sounds more like a tagline than a vision, but we already have the
> tagline "Plasma: Getting things done."
You lost part of it. I thought it was "Plasma: Get things done and go 
tauchen?"  :)

Cheers
Olivier
> 
> > Well just some (bad) ideas...
> 
> They're not bad ideas at all, it's really a matter of how much Plasma wants
> to focus.
> Thank you for the input!
> 
> > Olivier