Re: koffice/kplato

On Wednesday 23 November 2005 08:45, Dag Andersen wrote:
> > I sure see the filename = classname rule is a valid argument to
> > keep (revert to) the prefix - as filenames will (in any case) keep
> > their prefix. But then, there is only the prefix difference between
> > filename and class, right?
>
> This was why I (slowly) topled over to maybe keeping it, but I'm not a
> stickler for these types of things...

In KWord we renamed all files to 
a) use the .cpp
b) use the classname exclusively
c) don't use lowercase due to readability issues; so its Task.cpp

In KPresenter this is also going to happen as soon as someone writes the 
script to do so.
In Koffice-libs we will probably do the same thing. But thats a lot of 
work.

Maybe its an idea to follow this format if there is going to be any 
renaming in kplato.

-- 
Thomas Zander

_______________________________________________
kplato mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kplato

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDhCm/CojCW6H2z/QRAuQ3AKCQjUmYjIF4ZPCW3+MmWqbOkuPPiQCfdJOr
dtQJRkFQ3d28Tn9x+Qv4uio=
=/BfV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----