Re: koffice/kplato

On Onsdag 23 november 2005 09:35, Thomas Zander wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 November 2005 08:45, Dag Andersen wrote:
> > > I sure see the filename = classname rule is a valid argument to
> > > keep (revert to) the prefix - as filenames will (in any case)
> > > keep their prefix. But then, there is only the prefix
> > > difference between filename and class, right?
> >
> > This was why I (slowly) topled over to maybe keeping it, but I'm
> > not a stickler for these types of things...
>
> In KWord we renamed all files to
> a) use the .cpp
> b) use the classname exclusively
> c) don't use lowercase due to readability issues; so its Task.cpp
On my todo, but probably after release.
.cc -> .cpp and uppercase seems ok, but what about prefix to .h files? 
In my view they need it as they may be used in 3rd party apps, or?
>
> In KPresenter this is also going to happen as soon as someone
> writes the script to do so.
> In Koffice-libs we will probably do the same thing. But thats a lot
> of work.
>
> Maybe its an idea to follow this format if there is going to be any
> renaming in kplato.
-- 
Mvh,
Dag Andersen