Re: (A)GPL 3
Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:47:07 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.licensing |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Dimecres 10 Agost 2011 15:16:02 Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 05:33:49PM +0200, Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé wrote: > > Today we seem to live in a cloudy world, thus there are new risks > > regarding licensing which could make traditional copyleft totally > > useless, that for there is the AGPL, couldn't it be officially allowed > > in the licensing policies? When we want to have copyleft, we should be > > able to protect the software using such a license, too. It is already > > used inofficially by ownCloud, where the risk is obvious. It is > > possible to use GPL code in AGPL programs. > > This has been on my TODO since OwnCloud came along, we should probably > add a clause to the licence policy saying AGPL is allowed for web > services. However I've not read the AGPL and I'm not too familiar > with the arguments for and against it (e.g. I hear Debian isn't a big > fan), nor do I understand how it can mix with GPL. AGPL1 can not be mixed with GPL2 AGPL3 can be mixed with GPL3. Albert