Re: licenses
Neil Stevens <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.licensing |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday August 22, 2002 12:05, ante wrote: > Well, I'm no develloper, so I do not have a habit of patching. I did > make a new version. In it I changed the artistic to the clarified > artistic. > > Also, I added the line: > "Note there is a new version of the LGPL, version 2.1." > > To make this complete, a few more things should be done (imho). > > 1 To kdelibs/licenses both the LGPL version 2.1 (LGPL_V2.1) and the > Clarified Artistic license (CLARIFIED ARTISTIC) should be added. > > 2 There is an other LGPL in cvs, kdelibs/copying.lib. Unless there are > reasons not to do this, it can be updated to lgpl version 2.1. We can't remove the LGPL version 2. There is a significant amount of code in KDE that uses that license. Some people reject the LGPL 2.1, and won't ever use it. - -- Neil Stevens - [email protected] "I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they have not a single political argument left." - Margaret Thatcher -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9ZTaRf7mnligQOmERAjQJAJ9sqV6T3TE+MHdpbkuXL3h2EtnugACgj4wz w7ufvwT1Ant/NZV/UkZweFA= =ENrC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----