Re: licenses
ante <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.licensing |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 22 August 2002 21:08, Neil Stevens wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thursday August 22, 2002 12:05, ante wrote: > > Well, I'm no develloper, so I do not have a habit of patching. I did > > make a new version. In it I changed the artistic to the clarified > > artistic. > > > > Also, I added the line: > > "Note there is a new version of the LGPL, version 2.1." > > > > To make this complete, a few more things should be done (imho). > > > > 1 To kdelibs/licenses both the LGPL version 2.1 (LGPL_V2.1) and the > > Clarified Artistic license (CLARIFIED ARTISTIC) should be added. > > > > 2 There is an other LGPL in cvs, kdelibs/copying.lib. Unless there are > > reasons not to do this, it can be updated to lgpl version 2.1. > > We can't remove the LGPL version 2. There is a significant amount of code > in KDE that uses that license. Some people reject the LGPL 2.1, and won't > ever use it. OK, that is clear. The copying.lib should stay version 2. Anyway, it is good to add version 2.1 and the clarified artistic. I hope someone takes care of that. (And the update of the policy.html.) Cordialemente, Ante > > - -- > Neil Stevens - [email protected] > "I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding > because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they > have not a single political argument left." - Margaret Thatcher > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iD8DBQE9ZTaRf7mnligQOmERAjQJAJ9sqV6T3TE+MHdpbkuXL3h2EtnugACgj4wz > w7ufvwT1Ant/NZV/UkZweFA= > =ENrC > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ****** http://home.uwnet.nl/~vita