Re: What is the license of oxygen icons? [POSSIBLE LICENSE VIOLATION]
Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]> Fri, 09 May 2014 00:22:42 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.licensing |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <11570652.DpGV4rMD5m@xps> |
El Dijous, 8 de maig de 2014, a les 16:56:24, Matthew Woehlke va escriure: > oxygen-icons.org seems to have disappeared, making it harder to know a > definitive answer. > > I'm trying to determine what is the actual licensing of the oxygen > icons, in connection to possible violations thereof. Specifically, > http://openiconlibrary.sourceforge.net/ claims they are dual-licensed as > CC-BY-SA 3.0, but I am unable to confirm this claim, and Wikipedia, > Fedora and http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Oxygen/Licensing all claim > that they are licensed *only* under LGPL. (Additionally, COPYING in the > tarballs only gives LGPL.) > > Is there any truth to the CC-BY-SA claim? If not, is there someone to > whom I should be reporting this violation? > > (It's worse than just openiconlibrary; who knows how many users are > using the icons in violation of LGPL...) You may want to mail Nuno and some of the other guys? They probably know which license they choose? Cheers, Albert