Re: What is the license of oxygen icons? [POSSIBLE LICENSE VIOLATION]
Jonathan Riddell <[email protected]> Fri, 16 May 2014 12:12:40 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.licensing |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The icons as distributed by KDE are LGPL 3 http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Oxygen/Licensing But from the now defunct oxygen-icons website: "Oxygen icon theme is dual licensed. You may copy it under the Creative Common Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License or the GNU Library General Public License." So it's not a problem to copy them using the CC licence. Jonathan On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 04:56:24PM -0400, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > oxygen-icons.org seems to have disappeared, making it harder to know a > definitive answer. > > I'm trying to determine what is the actual licensing of the oxygen > icons, in connection to possible violations thereof. Specifically, > http://openiconlibrary.sourceforge.net/ claims they are dual-licensed as > CC-BY-SA 3.0, but I am unable to confirm this claim, and Wikipedia, > Fedora and http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Oxygen/Licensing all claim > that they are licensed *only* under LGPL. (Additionally, COPYING in the > tarballs only gives LGPL.) > > Is there any truth to the CC-BY-SA claim? If not, is there someone to > whom I should be reporting this violation? > > (It's worse than just openiconlibrary; who knows how many users are > using the icons in violation of LGPL...)