Re: Other included files
Rob Kaper <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.licensing |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 03:18:27AM +0100, Randy Atractivo wrote: > Since GNU General Public License(GPL) is for the source code, it does not > cover the document file,right or wrong? Do it need a separate license? > What is the counterpart(usually used) of GPL for the documentation? You could license documentation under the GPL, but the GNU FDL (Free Documentation License) is usually more appropriate (and used for KDE documentation as well). See: http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html Regards, Rob -- Rob Kaper | "Whoever wants to know the heart and mind of America had [email protected] | better learn baseball" -- Jacques Barzun _______________________________________________ Kde-licensing mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-licensing
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA5jRjtppIl2G1SjcRAmnyAKCOg8FGv+sdQIosSIWum/yGi0aorQCfRt7V uingDduHBG0HgYRUhabMq2Q= =eLRF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----