Re: Re: Other included files
"Kevin Sproul" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.licensing |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
We normaly use the Free Documentation License. Here is the link and the Google Cache. (gnu.org is down right now) http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html http://216.239.39.104/search?q=cache:IMCBWu0yHEIJ:www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html+Free+Documentation+License&hl=en Or you can just use the GPL. -----Original Message----- From: Rob Kaper <[email protected]> To: Randy Atractivo <[email protected]> Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 06:21:55 +0200 Subject: Re: Other included files On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 03:18:27AM +0100, Randy Atractivo wrote: > Since GNU General Public License(GPL) is for the source code, it does not > cover the document file,right or wrong? Do it need a separate license? > What is the counterpart(usually used) of GPL for the documentation? You could license documentation under the GPL, but the GNU FDL (Free Documentation License) is usually more appropriate (and used for KDE documentation as well). See: http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html Regards, Rob -- Rob Kaper | "Whoever wants to know the heart and mind of America had [email protected] | better learn baseball" -- Jacques Barzun