Re: background layout
"luciash d' being" <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jan 2003 18:12:53 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.usability,gmane.comp.kde.look |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
hi, i think the 'current' screenshot (http://urbanlizard.com/~aseigo/screens/bgdialog/bg_current.png) takes care of maximal use of place on the smallest possible window space but it's too much confusing and looking "unprofessional". these new ones look much more better but there's really no need to make these widgets too wide just for colour selection. i suggest the http://urbanlizard.com/~aseigo/screens/bgdialog/bg_new_smallerWidgets.png is the best but please consider placing the groups of widgets in this sort of order: 1) Icon Text 2) Background Color 3) Background Picture the third setting group could be 'wrapped' under the 'monitor thumbnail' (there's the empty space now) so then u will get much more space to see the selected wallpaper path even on some small resolution monitors. luci Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > hi all... > > a new background dialog has been committed to CVS. there's a bit of a > disagreement over some layout issues. screenshots can be seen at: > > http://urbanlizard.com/~aseigo/screens/bgdialog/ > > i'd welcome some input. > > - -- > Aaron J. Seigo > GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 > > "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler" > - Albert Einstein > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE+OJvS1rcusafx20MRApyOAKCF77B0D+GEU8RQJr6SMBzrEqRQ6ACfSc40 > HFGB6u4mC6zu3qxdIzpyVXQ= > =My/h > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- :.. :.: ::: : luciash [graun]d' being :.:::.::. ::.::: :: :: : :.:.:: simply just an( )other web designer? :::::.::.:.:::.::: :.: : l u c i @ s h . g r o u n d . c z ::.:::..:::.::.::.:: :. :: c. p#one ++ 420 777 777 590 :::.::::..::.::: :: : :.: :: http://luci.skinbase.org ::.:::...:.: : .:: ::.: :: ::: :.. :.: ::: :