Re: New module for KPovModeler
Stephan Kulow <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.policies,gmane.comp.kde.devel.core |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Samstag, 4. Januar 2003 17:40, Waldo Bastian wrote: > On Saturday 04 January 2003 00:40, Dirk Mueller wrote: > > On Fre, 03 Jan 2003, Waldo Bastian wrote: > > > On kde-policies I proposed that application with more than 500 source > > > files should use a module of their own while smaller applications could > > > be part of a kdeextragear module. > > > > huh? counting source files is an interesting measurement :) > > > > > Since kpovmodeler has 226 source files, I suggest to move it to > > > kdeextragear-2. > > > > That makes the extragear an unorganized mess, similiar to kdenonbeta, > > probably just worse. > > Unlike kdenonbeta, the applications in kdeextragear are maintained, and > unlike kdenonbeta, there is a limit on the number of applications in each > kdeextragear module. I think that those two factors are sufficient to > prevent it from becoming a mess. > > For comparison, k3b in kdeextragear-1 has 234 source files. > > The number 500 is of course rather arbitrary, if people prefer to have many > seperate CVS modules one could put the treshold at 200. > I very much agree with Waldo on this. I can't see what makes kpovmodeler more special or more interesting or whatever than k3b. And we created kdeextragear for exactly that kind of application: well maintained and too special for general distribution. Greetings, Stephan