Re: Updated policy
"Petter E. Stokke" <[email protected]> Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:22:22 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.policies |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday 13 February 2004 19:15, Olaf Jan Schmidt wrote: > "or which primary purpose is illegal" This is dangerously ambiguous. Does "primary purpose" refer to the author's intention (in which case, how is this established), a percentage of use cases (and, if so, what percentage and who has the authority to document it), the prosecuting party's assertions, legal precedent, or what? The point needs either removal or serious clarification, and I personally feel it to be ambivalent enough that the former would be the prudent course of action. -- Petter E. Stokke <[email protected]> http://www.gibreel.net/ PGP key: http://www.gibreel.net/key.asc Fingerprint: 4FF3 12BD 692A 0FFF 984F 78DA 4776 81FB 1906 3A9F