Re: Web cvs

--===============0934913330==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-581604480


--Apple-Mail-1-581604480
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=US-ASCII;
	format=flowed

Did you see the actual link:

===============================

Please support one of our Sponsors: OurWorldShopping.com

===========================


This is the same information that is on the contributors page, under 
every person, or company that provides web, ftp services.

-Chris


On Feb 24, 2004, at 8:27 PM, Daniel Molkentin wrote:

> On Wednesday 25 February 2004 02:19, Christopher Molnar wrote:
>> This is not final, but this is to make anyone who is complaining
>> understand completly that the server is not a KDE server, KDE has NO
>> RIGHT to make demands on how things are displayed, I can and will take
>> my toys and go home.
> [...]
>> Yet, it is unbelievable to me that I have had to read a tirade of
>> emails demanding that I make the server "free" and demand that I take 
>> a
>> 1 line link off of the server. If this is the case than KDE needs to
>> remove all of the links off of the contributions page. They are all
>> advertisements.
>
> Ok, the only actual problem is that advertisements under the KDE 
> Domain mean
> that KDE e.V. (as the actual domain "owner") could be made responsible 
> for
> advertisements.
>
>> It is open for discussion, but I did not see any discussion in any of
>> the prior messages I just saw complaints.
>
> Ok, the basic question is: Could KDE e.V. be held liable for anything
> associated with advertisement and did I overlook other issues why it 
> was
> decided not to have sponsoring on *.kde.org websites and: what do we 
> do about
> themes.kde.org being an alias for kde-look.org. This is somewhat more
> problematic since kde-look might contain copyrighed material. But for 
> webcvs
> we either ask the e.V. Board to acknowledge the banner or we either 
> thank
> Chris for his hosting and move the stuff to an ad-free server and move 
> along.
>
> Does this sound acceptable to everyone?
>
> Cheers,
>   Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> Kde-policies mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-policies

--Apple-Mail-1-581604480
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=US-ASCII

Did you see the actual link:


===============================


<fontfamily><param>Times New Roman</param><bigger><bigger>Please
support one of our Sponsors:
<underline><color><param>0000,0000,FFFF</param>OurWorldShopping.com</color></underline> 


===========================


</bigger></bigger></fontfamily>

This is the same information that is on the contributors page, under
every person, or company that provides web, ftp services.


-Chris



On Feb 24, 2004, at 8:27 PM, Daniel Molkentin wrote:


<excerpt>On Wednesday 25 February 2004 02:19, Christopher Molnar wrote:

<excerpt>This is not final, but this is to make anyone who is
complaining

understand completly that the server is not a KDE server, KDE has NO

RIGHT to make demands on how things are displayed, I can and will take

my toys and go home.

</excerpt>[...]

<excerpt>Yet, it is unbelievable to me that I have had to read a
tirade of

emails demanding that I make the server "free" and demand that I take a

1 line link off of the server. If this is the case than KDE needs to

remove all of the links off of the contributions page. They are all

advertisements.

</excerpt>

Ok, the only actual problem is that advertisements under the KDE
Domain mean 

that KDE e.V. (as the actual domain "owner") could be made responsible
for 

advertisements.


<excerpt>It is open for discussion, but I did not see any discussion
in any of

the prior messages I just saw complaints.

</excerpt>

Ok, the basic question is: Could KDE e.V. be held liable for anything 

associated with advertisement and did I overlook other issues why it
was 

decided not to have sponsoring on *.kde.org websites and: what do we
do about 

themes.kde.org being an alias for kde-look.org. This is somewhat more 

problematic since kde-look might contain copyrighed material. But for
webcvs 

we either ask the e.V. Board to acknowledge the banner or we either
thank 

Chris for his hosting and move the stuff to an ad-free server and move
along.


Does this sound acceptable to everyone?


Cheers,

  Daniel

_______________________________________________

Kde-policies mailing list

[email protected]

https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-policies

</excerpt>
--Apple-Mail-1-581604480--


--===============0934913330==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Kde-policies mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-policies

--===============0934913330==--