Re: advert on webcvs
"Aaron J. Seigo" <[email protected]> Tue, 24 Feb 2004 23:18:43 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.policies |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 if this is a bit out-of-sync with the thread, please excuse me. i'm only catching my personal mail every couple of days right now, which is quite disorienting for me .. heh... On February 24, 2004 02:29, Andreas Pour wrote: > Whoever linked to kde-themes.org with themes.kde.org, what is the thinking > there? And what is the kde.org advert policy? IIRC this decision was made > by someone and at somepoint discussed on kde-sysadmin only. here's how i perceive it: all the core KDE websites that represent the project such as kde.org, developer.kde.org, etc ... should not have ads on them. there is nothing to gain from it and it only detracts from our message. however, for sites such as kde-[look|apps].org which also have a *.kde.org alias that are privately hosted and are not core informational repositories for the KDE project i don't see the harm. the fact is that we have kde-look.org and kde-apps.org today because of sponsorship, which translates into banners. our choices are pretty obvoius: have the community sites and accept the reality that comes with being able to support them (e.g. in some cases banners), fund them ourselves (would be nice, isn't a current reality), or not have them. i'd prefer the second option, as i'm sure most would. i don't think anyone would like the last option. so we are left, at least for now, with the first option. and everyone is winning from it. it's not like anybody is making money off of it, anyways, and even if they were, i probably wouldn't really care. to whit, kde.com and apps.kde.com have used the KDE name for a long time and have been a commercial interest for a long time and when/if they come back will do so with sponsorship. i see kde.com as being far more sensitive an issue than themes.kde.org which simply points to kde-look.org. we need to do as much as we can to support community efforts without compromising our "values" and objectives, and we can achieve that without blanket statement proclamations that cover every *.kde.* domain in the world, especially when we aren't personally taking responsibility for of the maintenence and support of all of them but do reap their benefits. KDE is about the community and our users, not just a central authority known as The KDE Project, right? wow. there i go being long winded again. - -- Aaron J. Seigo GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 while (!horse()); cart(); -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAPD5D1rcusafx20MRAuDdAJ0dNQYe4ocA+LOu9gt0cCfRaMO25ACeMU0U Z5d253HZykuBcR0bcAYf0F8= =Q3X9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----