Re: Review Request 128707: Add support for captive portals
Sebastian Kügler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.knetworkmanager,gmane.comp.kde.usability,gmane.comp.kde.devel.plasma |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128707/#review99162 ----------------------------------------------------------- Ship it! Good solution, makes total sense. - Sebastian Kügler On Sept. 14, 2016, 9:02 a.m., Jan Grulich wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128707/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 14, 2016, 9:02 a.m.) > > > Review request for Network Management, Plasma, KDE Usability, and Lamarque Souza. > > > Bugs: 365417 > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365417 > > > Repository: plasma-nm > > > Description > ------- > > Adds portal monitor to our kded module, which checks NetworkManager connectivity. If the value gets changed to NM_CONNECTIVITY_PORTAL (means we are behind a captive portal), then we open a QWebEngineView trying to load "http://kde.org" page which is supposed to be redirected to the captive portal page. Once user logs in and url changes, we re-check the connectivity again and close the web view if we are no longer behind the captive portal. > > > Diffs > ----- > > kded/CMakeLists.txt 1f0613e > kded/networkmanagement.notifyrc f95d94b > kded/portalmonitor.h PRE-CREATION > kded/portalmonitor.cpp PRE-CREATION > kded/service.cpp 18ffd41 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128707/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Tested with three different captive portals and it worked perfectly. > > > Thanks, > > Jan Grulich > >