Re: Connection timeouts - sending

Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.users.pim
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thursday 19 March 2009, Peter wrote:
> On Thursday 19 March 2009 07:17:31 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Peter wrote:
> > > I think we are assuming too much here. If all KMail users
> > > informed us that the timeouts are fine, then we could say that it
> > > is fine for everyone, but not all KMail users need this feature
> > > of course, but some probably do, or would like it. It's about
> > > giving the user the opportunity to decide if they want to use
> > > such a setting or not, by adding it as a feature, surely.
> >
> > Searching our bug database I found
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73423
>
> It mentions timeout at 600 seconds, it certainly wasn't 10 mins, more
> like 2 mins max.

Here (KDE 3.5.10), the timeout for server connect is 20 seconds and the 
timeout for server response is 600 seconds. The error message 
("Connection timeout, try later") suggests that it's the connect that 
timed out.


Regards,
Ingo

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAknConkACgkQGnR+RTDgudgt6gCg0MCEiKc4LWNMrf9Z5dJNbVg6
FuoAnRy0CoFaJlrgxzAeVMeS13efCOF9
=gxfA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.