Re: It shouldn't be this hard
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 19 May 2010, Art Alexion wrote: > Yesterday, I upgraded my KDE from 4,4,2 to 4.4.3. and again, > nepomuk/akonadi broke. I fixed it -- once again -- with my tried > and true methods of removing the akonadi directories under ~/.config > and ~/.kde/config. > > I haven't had an upgrade involving akonadi that didn't break it. > > But it shouldn't be this hard. I'm a fairly technical user, and I > find the instability of this technology troublesome. This isn't 4.0 > anymore, We are up to 4.4, and the underlying KDE technologies are > still unreliable. I would no longer ever recommend KDE to a > non-technical user. > > While I still prefer the KDE apps, like kmail, konqueror, k3b, etc., > the KDE framework is far less stable than even Windows 98. > > This is meant as a plea more than a complaint. Please... FWIW, after reading your message I have upgraded my KDE SC from 4.4.2 to 4.4.3. After using 4.4.3 for the past few days without any problems I remembered your message. I cannot confirm your observations. Quite the opposite. On openSUSE 11.2 upgrading from 4.4.2 to 4.4.3 does not seem to introduce any problems or instabilities. So, as far as I can tell, the problems you are experiencing are either not caused by KDE but by your distro or you are using KDE PIM differently than me. I am mostly using KMail only, but I had a quick look at the address book and I didn't see or notice anything unusual. Regards, Ingo _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkv4J7AACgkQGnR+RTDgudi7qgCggo25aAb/xpaKmr/n9w8hVGR1 u4cAoN0oV9RqVSuJyuutpkqNRZYyZm+w =rSiK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----