Re: What's up with kdepim*?
ianseeks <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.pim,gmane.comp.kde.users.pim,gmane.comp.kde.releases |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <13967499.mtiy7Ahm5V@lianli> |
On Monday 20 Jul 2015 15:21:39 Aleix Pol wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:19 PM, laurent Montel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le Monday 20 July 2015, 06:45:31 Jeremy Whiting a écrit : > >> TLDR we can't release applications that depend on an unreleased > >> framework...> > > ? > > So we can release an application which depends on lib which is not > > released ? > Framework is a synonym for library. I wonder what they'll replace Framework with once there is a new paradigm? I wish we'd all stop finding new synonyms and stick with the original terminology. It was terrible watching all the justification for creating the name "Leap" - i guess i've been around the block too many times and i'm cynical. i'll go back to sleep now > It doesn't make a difference, I'd > say. Releasing with unreleased dependencies means that distributors > can't ship what we release, therefore it's a bogus release. > > Aleix > _______________________________________________ > KDE PIM mailing list [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim > KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/ _______________________________________________ KDE PIM mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/