Re: [Kde-pim] What's up with kdepim*?
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.users.pim,gmane.comp.kde.releases,gmane.comp.kde.devel.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday July 20 2015 15:48:42 ianseeks wrote: > On Monday 20 Jul 2015 15:21:39 Aleix Pol wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:19 PM, laurent Montel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Framework is a synonym for library. Not exactly, no. A framework is a bit more than just a library; AFAIK the term was used first by Apple to indicate something comparable to a (shared) library which is in fact a bundle containing the library binary and/or (the associated) headerfiles possibly combined with metadata and dependencies. In the OS X Finder you can manipulate these things because they pack everything under a single directory (which is even movable to some extent). I doubt a bit that one could achieve that with the KDE Frameworks should it ever be a goal. R. _______________________________________________ KDE PIM users mailing list Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users