Re: Webapp-Antlet: First version
"Michael Homeijer" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.krysalis.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <006b01c3f340$95ba58e0$657ba8c0@homeijer> |
Hi, ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Kloss" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 10:04 AM Subject: Webapp-Antlet: First version > Hi, > > I implemented a first version of a webapp-antlet. > > Interested? > > Michael Kloss > I'm interested. Some comments on the antlet: - I think it should be called "webapp". - I think all irrelevant files should should be left out (eg. status.xml). - The hard part is probably filling the lib dir with jars from ruper (from dependencies in module.xml), but that can be left out until ruper/dependencies are working. It seems right to create small initial versions and leave standardisation of build directories, generated doc directories, lib dir construction, documentation etc. until there's a small collection of working antlets. Anyone else? Michael ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click