Re: TN5250 data stream issues -- none of this makes any sense!
Sam_L <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.as400.java,gmane.comp.hardware.ibm.midrange |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Different JVM being used? (Just a thought, have absolutely no experience with this.) Sam On 11/20/2019 4:42 PM, James H. H. Lampert wrote: > (cross-posted again) > > Today, the two customer boxes have been behaving themselves with respect > to our emulator, with my sessions staying up for hours at a time, > instead of minutes or seconds, regardless of whether I was pounding on > the session or ignoring it. > > The latest bit of information: at least one of them had been IPL'd one > CPU short, and had been (and I quote straight from the source) ". . . > pegged at 98-100% CPU all day." > > But that doesn't answer the question of why the IBM emulator and TN5250j > were able to stay connected for hours, under those conditions, while our > emulator's average connect time was measured in seconds. > > -- > JHHL -- This is the Java Programming on and around the IBM i (JAVA400-L) mailing list To post a message email: [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l or email: JAVA400-L-request-+hD5IHI5Xscn3HwCXmMcX9BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at https://archive.midrange.com/java400-l. Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com