Re: [stack] language hierarchy
John Nowak <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.concatenative |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Dec 5, 2007, at 2:04 AM, John Nowak wrote: > I don't think there's anything composable about Haskell Just to point out; I think this is the desirable outcome of a good definition for "composable". Haskell isn't any more composable than Joy is applicative, despite Haskell have a 'compose' function and Joy have an 'apply' function (called 'i'). - John