Re: [stack] language hierarchy

John Nowak <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Dec 2007 02:16:45 -0500

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.lang.concatenative
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Dec 5, 2007, at 2:11 AM, John Nowak wrote:

> Just to point out; I think this is the desirable outcome of a good
> definition for "composable". Haskell isn't any more composable than
> Joy is applicative, despite Haskell have a 'compose' function and Joy
> have an 'apply' function (called 'i').

Really not sure what I had against the present tense in this one...

- John