Re: [stack] Re: Joy and code readability
John Nowak <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.concatenative |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Apr 1, 2009, at 5:25 AM, fabio_cevasco wrote:
> Could you elaborate a bit more on stack comments? You mean writing
> (in Joy) something like:
>
> (* A -> A A *)
Yep.
> Which concatenative languages verify these comments?
Factor does. Cat may allow them; it's been awhile since I've looked at
it. Cat will, however, automatically infer the effect in question for
you.
> Do they expect comments after the code they refer to, e.g. something
> similar to:
I believe it is only allowed for definitions as such:
: over ( a b -- a b a ) [ dup ] dip swap ;
- John