Re: [stack] stOck
John Nowak <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.concatenative |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Apr 1, 2009, at 5:33 AM, chris glur wrote: > So every task in the universe uses a stack/tree > of sub-tasks by it's 'actor? > > So the stack will always be there for implimentation. > But if you want it more hidden 'we can do that'. > OTOH *you do* stcck your actions into sub-actions, > so the stack/tree is NOT an un-natural mental model ? I've read mad libs more coherent than this. Come on man, at least fire up the spellchecker... - John