Re: A broken brand?
Kevin Reid <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.e.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mar 13, 2008, at 18:04, Raoul Duke wrote: >> The problem here is that we have two situations that we cannot >> really >> distinguish. One of them is considered valid (holding the >> unsealer and a > > is reflection generally considered fair game? e.g. the box could test > if there are extra stacks in the call hierarchy? No. The box (all objects in an ocap system, even) has no authority to have that information. Making call stack information available puts you right back to identity-based access control, confused deputies, and information leakage. -- Kevin Reid <http://homepage.mac.com/kpreid/>