Re: A broken brand?
Bill Frantz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.e.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <r02010500-1049-F5482EB2F14A11DCB7FC0030658F0F64@[192.168.1.5]> |
[email protected] (Raoul Duke) on Thursday, March 13, 2008 wrote: >> The problem here is that we have two situations that we cannot really >> distinguish. One of them is considered valid (holding the unsealer and a > >is reflection generally considered fair game? e.g. the box could test >if there are extra stacks in the call hierarchy? Well, reflection doesn't really work between mutually untrusted machines on a network. Perhaps we will be backed into the corner of having the box logic trust the proxies produced by certain subsystems, and behave differently when encountering one of those proxies... Cheers - Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz |"We used to quip that "password" is the most common 408-356-8506 | password. Now it's 'password1.' Who said users haven't www.periwinkle.com | learned anything about security?" -- Bruce Schneier