Re: ECMA standard or forking the language?

>> Richard A. O'Keefe wrote:
>> Concerning the "fork" issue, my perspective from my recent close reading
>> of the ECMA draft is that it is not the SmartEiffel team who are
>> forking. ECMA is the fork.

> Colnet Dominique wrote:
> Perfectly right.
> As I have said many times during ECMA meetings, this (speaking about
> the ECMA meeting in progress) is not a normalization work.

So, the ECMA is using the draft for languague experimentation?

Somehow I don't think that the ECMA C# draft will be undergoing drastic
changes anytime soon.