Re: ECMA standard or forking the language?

"Grant Rettke" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.eiffel.smalleiffel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Peter Gummer
> On 29/04/2005, at 6:11 PM, Colnet Dominique wrote:
>
>> Peter Gummer wrote:
>>> On 28/04/2005, at 6:54 PM, Colnet Dominique wrote:
>>>> Also note that ISE has its own deviations from the standard.
>>> What are you referring to, Dominique? No such deviations come to my
>>> mind.
>> The .net interface is one example.
>
> How is supporting .NET a deviation from the ECMA standard?
>
>> But it is clear that ISE has less deviation from ECMA standard because
>> of ECMA members. Don't want to flame, but it is a matter of fact.
>
> Yes, you are the only SmallEiffeler listed among the ECMA members, if I
> remember rightly.
>
>> Again, don't be afraid, we will just continue our work.
>
> I'm grateful for your work: the existence of alternatives to ISE Eiffel
> has contributed to the acceptance of Eiffel where I work.
>
> But you scare me when you say you don't intend to implement the
> standard.
>
> - Peter Gummer
>
>
>


Grant Rettke
Centare Group, Ltd.
262-827-1010 x313 Voice
262-827-0701 Fax
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.