Re: Parenthesized Target Notation (was: Partial retraction)

Richard A. O'Keefe wrote:
> Eirc Bezault's response to my comments is thus based on a misreading of
> them, as if I was in some fashion defending SmartEiffel.

I was not replying to you in particular (I'm sorry, I should
not have quoted one of your messages), but to those in this
mailing list and elsewhere who are complaining that Gobo does
not compile as is with ECMA Eiffel, and to people who want me
to make it clear which fork of the Eiffel language Gobo will
follow in the future. Most of these people claim that ECMA
Eiffel is a fork and SmartEiffel is not. Now, even if ECMA
Eiffel had no single backward incompatibility there is no
doubt that SmartEiffel would not support it anyway. So I
guess I already spent too much time here and should save my
energy to try to make Gobo work with SE 2.2.

-- 
Eric Bezault
mailto:[email protected]
http://www.gobosoft.com