Re: Re: Parenthesized Target Notation (was: Partial retraction)

Eric Bezault wrote:
> Now, even if ECMA Eiffel had no single backward incompatibility there
> is no doubt that SmartEiffel would not support it anyway.

I hope your words went beyond your thoughts. Do you belong to the 
SmartEiffel core team?

You have no doubts? Well I do.


> should save my energy to try to make Gobo work with SE 2.2.

What are your problems with 2.2? It does not change that much from 2.1, 
apart from adding new libraries and fixing bugs. Did I miss something?

Regards
--
Cyril Adrian -- ALPLOG
@ PSA Peugeot Citroën, Sochaux, France
tél. +33 (0)3 81 33 48 76
fax +33 (0)3 81 33 16 06