Re: SE library's licence

On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 19:19 +0200, Julien PUYDT wrote:
> LGPL code can be linked in both open source and proprietary product ; it 
> only forces disclosures of the changes to the lib itself, not of the 
> full code of the program. It is the licence generally used when GPL 
> would be too strong.
that requires a clean separation of that code. the GPL and LGPL are
generally unsuitable for any language that doesn't follow the C model of
compilation and linking or is a script language.

in this case, full system analysis is probably an issue.


patrick mauritz