Re: Questions about "erl -epmd_start false"

Jérôme de Bretagne <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general
Message-ID <CA+kEDGEpwD6a0kfi9Yyj=oCLD34eKwBn9XOn76_HOAhO=RWMnA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Shino,

This behavior is indeed expected.

To avoir all registrations to epmd, you can pass the -no_epmd option
instead.

It is mentioned in the following documentation:
https://erlang.org/doc/apps/erts/alt_dist.html

Cheers,
Jérôme

Le ven. 18 déc. 2020 à 03:40, Shunichi Shinohara <[email protected]> a
écrit :

> Hi List,
>
> I try "epmdlessless" configuration described in:
>   Running Erlang Releases without EPMD on OTP 23.1+ · Erlware Blog
>   https://blog.erlware.org/epmdlessless/
>
> It works as described, thanks to people who contributed to the feature!
> However, it behaves in an unexpected way (to me) under epmd daemon running
> case.
>
> Expected behavior is the case without running epmd daemon. After launching
> a node as:
>
> % erl -sname foo -start_epmd false -erl_epmd_port 14693
> Erlang/OTP 23 [erts-11.1.4] [source] [64-bit] [smp:16:16] [ds:16:16:10]
> [async-threads:1]
>
> epmd daemon does *NOT* start, as expected:
>
> % epmd -names
> epmd: Cannot connect to local epmd
>
> On the other hand, after epmd daemon started as epmd -daemon,
> by executing the same erl command above, the node is registered to epmd
> daemon:
>
> % epmd -names
> epmd: up and running on port 4369 with data:
> name foo at port 14693
>
> The questions are:
> - Is this behavior expected (to other than me)?
> - Is there any option(s) of erl command to avoid registration to epmd?
>   # I guess it's possible by using https://github.com/tsloughter/epmdless
>
> Thanks,
> Shino
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.