Re: Closing TCP/SSL connexion or let the VM close it
Frank Muller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFA6GnALuKuwxQQ0Nzgjq7HqRQ8GVgvXCJE89H0r=khgNGSwxw@mail.gmail.com> |
Thanks Guilherme. Anyone else? N.B: I’m having troubles to reach this mailinglist. It’s said mailmain can’t find module gd /Frank Thur . 17 Dec. 2020 19:38, Guilherme Andrade <[email protected]> wrote : > Hello Frank, > > AFAIK, the only difference is that, when letting the VM take care of it, > monitors will be triggered and delivered to the connection owners (whether > SSL processes or TCP ports.) > > What kind of impact that will have on performance is unknown to me - I > suppose only measurements could tell. > > (Unless you're explicitly `gen_tcp:shutdown`ing or `ssl:shutdown`ing your > connections in order to try and flush the send buffers - in that case, I > expect there will be a difference.) > > On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 07:14, Frank Muller <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I’m wondering if my processes should explicitly close the TCP/SSL >> connexion they hold before exiting or should they let the VM handles that? >> Does it make any difference? >> >> I’ve a bunch a processes in my app (around ~15K per at any even time). >> >> /Frank >> > > > -- > Guilherme >