Re: Erlang forums (was Re: PING TEST)
Igor Clark <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Dec 2021 17:02:37 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree wholeheartedly. Thank you for putting it so carefully and insightfully, Yao. It would be a great shame to kill the mailing list. It’s different from a forum, and something valuable would be lost. Best Igor > On 17 Dec 2021, at 15:10, Yao Bao <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > Erlang bring us together as a community, we don't share data > between processes, but we do share love from Erlang. > > It is not common for programmers say "love" to a programming > language. Erlang programmers might not use Erlang in daily job, > but we are willing to put some of our life and energy into this. > Personally, mainly because of the uncommon beauty of it. > > Yes, we are still marginal. And this might be the root cause of > this movement. I can understand it, but why can't we have both? > > Yes, resources are always limited, and we can't split energy into > two things equally, this is understandable. But having both, or, > in a foreseeable future, we might discover some better methods > to organize our community, then we can say this is the true "rich" > community. New generations are good and unavoidable, but I > hope we can keep the old generations as much as we can. > > Every once in a while, some shiny things appears, and we are > not against shiny things, they are good, if it is good enough to > replace the old one entirely, nobody will miss it. We just need > sometime to prove it. > > We can deprecate language features, but I hope we do not > deprecate people. Shiny tools can attract young generations, > I don't know the story or history about Elixir forums, but I would > say the biggest difference would be the origin of these two > languages. Of course it is good to have a try, after receiving the > new Erlang forums announcement, I give it a try almost > immediately, and personally prefer this mailing list for now. > > Although as we see, this mailing list is not very "active", but we > really care about it. And this might be why some "sad" emotion > comes along. If we don't care about it, we would not say any word > about it. > > I really hope this mailing list is still alive. Maybe one reason would > be good enough to keep it: old generations are still alive. > > Thanks, > Yao >