Re: Erlang forums (was Re: PING TEST)
Schneider <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Dec 2021 18:12:50 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
+111111 \Frans > Op 17 dec. 2021 om 18:02 heeft Igor Clark <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven: > > I agree wholeheartedly. Thank you for putting it so carefully and insightfully, Yao. > > It would be a great shame to kill the mailing list. It’s different from a forum, and something valuable would be lost. > > Best > Igor > >> On 17 Dec 2021, at 15:10, Yao Bao <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Erlang bring us together as a community, we don't share data >> between processes, but we do share love from Erlang. >> >> It is not common for programmers say "love" to a programming >> language. Erlang programmers might not use Erlang in daily job, >> but we are willing to put some of our life and energy into this. >> Personally, mainly because of the uncommon beauty of it. >> >> Yes, we are still marginal. And this might be the root cause of >> this movement. I can understand it, but why can't we have both? >> >> Yes, resources are always limited, and we can't split energy into >> two things equally, this is understandable. But having both, or, >> in a foreseeable future, we might discover some better methods >> to organize our community, then we can say this is the true "rich" >> community. New generations are good and unavoidable, but I >> hope we can keep the old generations as much as we can. >> >> Every once in a while, some shiny things appears, and we are >> not against shiny things, they are good, if it is good enough to >> replace the old one entirely, nobody will miss it. We just need >> sometime to prove it. >> >> We can deprecate language features, but I hope we do not >> deprecate people. Shiny tools can attract young generations, >> I don't know the story or history about Elixir forums, but I would >> say the biggest difference would be the origin of these two >> languages. Of course it is good to have a try, after receiving the >> new Erlang forums announcement, I give it a try almost >> immediately, and personally prefer this mailing list for now. >> >> Although as we see, this mailing list is not very "active", but we >> really care about it. And this might be why some "sad" emotion >> comes along. If we don't care about it, we would not say any word >> about it. >> >> I really hope this mailing list is still alive. Maybe one reason would >> be good enough to keep it: old generations are still alive. >> >> Thanks, >> Yao >>