RE: Activity

Swindle is very impressive but I worry about it being above a full scheme
language and still having efficiency and integration issues.  I would love
to try swindle out to find out how well it works.  Eli looks to be quite a
hacker!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:googoogaga-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Vanier
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 5:10 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Googoogaga] Activity
> 
> > From: Raffael Cavallaro <[email protected]>
> > Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 15:26:31 -0400
> >
> > Along these lines, how difficult would it be to do goo's object
> > system in scheme/on top of scheme? Then goo could run anywhere that a
> > scheme implementation ran - I was thinking of chicken which compiles
> > to ANSI C, but of course any scheme should work.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> > Raffael Cavallaro, Ph.D.
> > [email protected]
> >
> 
> There are several multimethod-based object systems that run on top of
> scheme.  Last time I checked (a few years ago), Guile scheme had GOOPS,
> which was a generic function-based object system.  Given the slow pace of
> Guile development, it's probably still there (though apparently no longer
> maintained).  And Eli Barzilay wrote a multimethod based object system for
> PLT scheme called swindle which he still maintains.  So if you don't need
> the _exact_ goo object system, these might be worth looking into.
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Googoogaga mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csail.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/googoogaga


_______________________________________________
Googoogaga mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csail.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/googoogaga