Re: Getting into the Haskell Platform
Adam Foltzer <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:54:55 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.haskell.hopengl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPorAaHbjF0nikTE2A8AWdsQ_4X=4WZz0Q_U6v2ncLxXN2OS=Q@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Jason, * I'm against moving StateVar to the Foreign namespace, as it's a nice interface for IORefs that I use to write systems code in the non-FFI Haskell world. Perhaps the Data namespace would be an easier sell if the types of the StateVar operations were made more general (i.e., not specifically IO), but such a change would probably need MPTCs or Type Families. * The Foreign namespace seems like a good fit for ObjectName, as I can't imagine a use for it in idiomatic non-FFI code. Duplicating the class in the GL and AL packages might make things ugly when working on a project with both, but I have no first-hand experience here. Thanks for your work on the packages, Adam On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Jason Dagit <[email protected]> wrote: > I wrote the following email to the Haskell Platform list asking for > guidance getting the latest versions of OpenGL back into the platform > (they currently only have an old version): > http://projects.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-platform/2012-January/001738.html > > It's unfortunate that no one has responded there. It's something I'd > like to move forward on. > > Do people here have opinions about the suggestions I made in that email? > > Thanks, > Jason > > _______________________________________________ > HOpenGL mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/hopengl