Re: Jython 2.7 rc3 soft launch

Jim Baker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.jython.devel
Message-ID <CAOhO=aNkU5G6keKvTWDCDjKk9sSX6OYQ-z8m5ZtfgMERzeDFTA@mail.gmail.com>
It's worth bearing in mind that not even CPython regrtest always build
cleanly on their buildbots, whether it is 2.7, 3.4, or 3.5. See
http://buildbot.python.org/all/waterfall?category=2.7.stable&category=3.4.stable&category=3.x.stable

This was part of the discussion at the Python Language Summit two weeks ago
at PyCon with respect to CPython dev workflow.

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:58 AM, [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Jeff Allen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It wasn't a stop the launch message, just reporting what I saw. I'm
> happy to
> > go with others' judgement.
> >
> > I am *instinctively* a bit uncomfortable that anything go out with
> failing
> > or skipped tests. But my instincts have been shaped by the sort of
> subjects
> > where just one counterexample proves you wrong, *not* by much experience
> > launching software products. I'm interested in how this level of test
> > conformance maps to user experience. I think Jython is pretty good now
> and
> > that we won't be buried in bug reports.
> >
> > I'd like to see testing give us a clearer result. At the moment it always
> > fails and you have to work out what kind of failure to know where you
> stand.
> > On the one hand I think defects should be visible and painful; on the
> other
> > I'd like to have a test that only shouts when something unexpected
> happens.
> > (And I'd like a build bot to do the shouting.)  Now I understand regrtest
> > better (since the weekend!), and which parts we added, I think it offers
> a
> > way of saying "everything is as expected (but don't forget these
> problems)",
> > vs. "you just broke something", with only the latter being shouted. It's
> > nearly there.
> You are totally right Jeff, getting a clean regression test is the
> goal, and I think we are getting close. Some kind of built bot would
> be even better :) It should be very doable in the 2.7.x series.
>
> With the 3.x series I hope to go even further and someday have build
> bots that actually track changes in the standard CPython library as
> they come in. Well, I can dream can't I? :)
>
> -Frank
>



-- 
- Jim

jim.baker@{colorado.edu|python.org|rackspace.com|zyasoft.com}
twitter.com/jimbaker
github.com/jimbaker
bitbucket.com/jimbaker

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF

_______________________________________________
Jython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.