Re: Jython 2.7 rc3 soft launch
Jim Baker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.jython.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOhO=aNkU5G6keKvTWDCDjKk9sSX6OYQ-z8m5ZtfgMERzeDFTA@mail.gmail.com> |
It's worth bearing in mind that not even CPython regrtest always build cleanly on their buildbots, whether it is 2.7, 3.4, or 3.5. See http://buildbot.python.org/all/waterfall?category=2.7.stable&category=3.4.stable&category=3.x.stable This was part of the discussion at the Python Language Summit two weeks ago at PyCon with respect to CPython dev workflow. On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:58 AM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Jeff Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > > It wasn't a stop the launch message, just reporting what I saw. I'm > happy to > > go with others' judgement. > > > > I am *instinctively* a bit uncomfortable that anything go out with > failing > > or skipped tests. But my instincts have been shaped by the sort of > subjects > > where just one counterexample proves you wrong, *not* by much experience > > launching software products. I'm interested in how this level of test > > conformance maps to user experience. I think Jython is pretty good now > and > > that we won't be buried in bug reports. > > > > I'd like to see testing give us a clearer result. At the moment it always > > fails and you have to work out what kind of failure to know where you > stand. > > On the one hand I think defects should be visible and painful; on the > other > > I'd like to have a test that only shouts when something unexpected > happens. > > (And I'd like a build bot to do the shouting.) Now I understand regrtest > > better (since the weekend!), and which parts we added, I think it offers > a > > way of saying "everything is as expected (but don't forget these > problems)", > > vs. "you just broke something", with only the latter being shouted. It's > > nearly there. > You are totally right Jeff, getting a clean regression test is the > goal, and I think we are getting close. Some kind of built bot would > be even better :) It should be very doable in the 2.7.x series. > > With the 3.x series I hope to go even further and someday have build > bots that actually track changes in the standard CPython library as > they come in. Well, I can dream can't I? :) > > -Frank > -- - Jim jim.baker@{colorado.edu|python.org|rackspace.com|zyasoft.com} twitter.com/jimbaker github.com/jimbaker bitbucket.com/jimbaker ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF _______________________________________________ Jython-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev