Re: 5.1 package proposal and Kepler libs

>>I would like to see more feedback on the list before implementing 
>>nothing -- only to know wether there is a general feeling about this 
>>(important, I think) issue.

I think we will not be getting much more feedback :)
I'm sure LuaCheia has some users apart from us, but I'm not sure they 
are reading this list and would chime in...

> My opinion on the side-by-side issue is, once the usable modules in
> LuaCheia are loadable using require(), then we can immediately drop
> cheia.load().

I guess going parallel for the first run would be safe & ok. That way we 
don't break anything for potential users with lots of code.
LuaCheia still being alpha, I guess we don't need to worry too much 
about 'drastic' changes as long as they are clearly labeld.

-Martin


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/