Re: 5.1 package proposal and Kepler libs

Peter Loveday wrote:
> While I'm not currently using LuaCheia, I do regularly read this list 
> and have played with it a bit.  While I would love to be able to use it, 
> the lack of a beta version in the last 18 months, let alone an official 
> release has made that impossible... I cannot ship a product to my end 
> users without knowing that the module system will be stable at least for 
> the lifespan of the current version.

Well, I can surely understand that...
That'S anotjer reason why we should go the standard-as-possible route. 
Once module support is implemented in that way, we can release a 
version. Further work will then be additions, not core stuff...

> I would prefer to see things migrate towards one consistant package 
> module, and lose the custom cheia.load() as soon as possible.  The 
> quicker modules become standardised, the better.

Now that there _is_ a standard way to do things, I absolutly agree.

Thanks Peter for your input,
-Martin



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/