RE: 5.1 package proposal and Kepler libs

Hi Martin,

>So the question to you would be: would it break any of your existing code
if we changed the dynamik loading of modules? Going from
> cheia.load() towards the 5.1 require() ?

Nope.  "Au contraire", it would be better, so we would have a standard on
all lua code we write.

Since cgilua, lua itself and luacheia have the same calls for loading libs,
our work is smaller. 

<OFF>And about cgilua, I'm using it on an intranet system, but an early
alpha version. Works great, but since the Kepler project keep changing the
code from time to time, and it has no standard defined (1 year and a half, i
guess, and we still have a alpha3 version, completely different from the
others) a friend of mine said that he'll start the "Cgilua: I believe"
campaign... heheheh </OFF>

Thanks !

---
J. Machado (machado-XIsc0q6iQsZfJ/[email protected])
Hands | www.hands.com.br
+55 21 2533-9425


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.8 - Release Date: 8/12/2004
 



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/